Evaluate
Hand us your closed files and see where Sentanis would have helped.
The audit is fixed in scope and price: 50 to 100 closed litigated files, replayed using only what was known at the time and scored against what happened. You get a written report in two to three weeks. It takes no live action.
What an evaluation involves
What you provide
A set of closed, represented auto bodily-injury files, including known misses, with the outcome labels your team approves.
What runs
The same demand pipeline shown in the demo, working from point-in-time records so later facts cannot leak in.
What we measure
How many demands were recognised and how early in their window, which deadlines were captured, and how many clerical tasks per file would have left the desk. Savings are modeled. A backtest cannot measure them.
What you receive
A claim-level scorecard, every miss and false alert, and a written recommendation to stop, retest, or proceed.
Your team decides whether to stop, retest, or proceed.
Before scoring begins, your claims, legal, and security owners agree the cohort, the rubric, the data route, and the thresholds. Nothing goes live because a date arrived.
Agreed before scoring
- Cohort and outcome labels
- Scoring rubric and acceptance thresholds
- Data route and retention
- Who signs off: claims sponsor, legal, compliance, model risk
The path to live use
The sequence is fixed and your team sets the pace. Each step is earned on evidence.
Start with one bounded workflow.
Represented auto demand response is the first evaluation we recommend.